A CITY MILK AND CREAM CONTEST
TEXT
TEXT
PAPER
Transcriber’s Note: Italicized text is surrounded by underscores:
_italics_.
Issued October 28, 1907.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY.--CIRCULAR 117.
A. D. MELVIN, CHIEF OF BUREAU.
A CITY MILK AND CREAM CONTEST
AS A PRACTICAL METHOD OF
IMPROVING THE MILK SUPPLY.
BY
C. B. LANE, B. S.,
_Assistant Chief of the Dairy Division_,
AND
IVAN C. WELD,
_Assistant Dairyman, Dairy Division_.
[Illustration: (colophon)]
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1907.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,
_Washington, D. C., August 29, 1907_.
SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith a manuscript entitled “A
City Milk and Cream Contest as a Practical Method of Improving the
Milk Supply,” by C. B. Lane, assistant chief of the Dairy Division,
and Ivan C. Weld, assistant dairyman in that division, and recommend
its publication as Circular 117 of this Bureau.
In view of the widespread interest now being taken in the production
of pure, clean, and wholesome milk, the contest described in this
paper, which was held at Cleveland, Ohio, is of especial significance
at this time. The results have been decidedly beneficial, and it is
believed that similar contests in other cities would be productive of
much good.
Because of the prevalence and danger of tuberculosis among dairy cows
and the importance of the tuberculin test as a means of detecting
and eradicating the disease, some information regarding Cleveland’s
experience with this test and some suggestions for the eradication of
tuberculosis have been included in the paper.
The thanks of the Department of Agriculture are extended to Dr. H.
G. Sherman and Mr. Howard Strong, of the Chamber of Commerce of
Cleveland, and Dr. C. W. Eddy, chief of the inspection division of
the public health department, for valuable cooperation and assistance
which contributed very largely to the success of the milk contest.
Acknowledgment is also made to the Cleveland press for bringing the
matter to the attention of the dairymen and the public in general
through the columns of the papers.
Respectfully, A. D. MELVIN,
_Chief of Bureau_.
HON. JAMES WILSON,
_Secretary of Agriculture_.
CONTENTS.
Page.
The first national milk and cream exhibit 5
State contests 5
The first city dairy contest 6
Conditions of entry 7
Judges 7
Medals 8
Letter to dairymen 8
Scoring the milk and cream 9
The dairy-farm contest 14
Principal defects found 16
Value of the contest to Cleveland 17
The value of milk contests 18
Value to the producer 18
Value to the dealer 19
Value to the consumer 19
Application of the Cleveland plan to other cities 19
Extracts from addresses 20
Cleveland’s experience with the tuberculin test 23
Importance of the tuberculin test 25
Methods for eradicating tuberculosis 26
Eradication of tuberculosis from the farm 26
State aid for the eradication of tuberculosis 27
A CITY MILK AND CREAM CONTEST AS A PRACTICAL
METHOD OF IMPROVING THE MILK SUPPLY.
THE FIRST NATIONAL MILK AND CREAM EXHIBIT.
The first milk and cream contest in this country was held in
connection with the National Dairy Show in Chicago, under the
direction of the Dairy Division, Bureau of Animal Industry,
Department of Agriculture, February 15-24, 1906.
The object of the contest was, first, educational; second, to
determine the possibilities in the handling and keeping of milk and
cream produced under sanitary conditions and kept cold; third, to
test a score card for rating fairly and accurately this class of
dairy products. Much interest was shown in this contest from the
beginning, and exhibits were sent from thirteen different States.
The results were most gratifying, one of the most striking being the
demonstration of the fact that clean milk, held at a low temperature,
could be shipped a thousand miles across the country and kept sweet
for a period of over five weeks.
It was further demonstrated that milk and cream could be scored with
reasonable accurateness for flavor, chemical qualities, keeping
qualities, etc., where a certain number of points were given to each.
A full report of this contest is given in Bulletin 87 of the Bureau
of Animal Industry.
STATE CONTESTS.
Since the national contest was held several States have had similar
exhibits in connection with the State dairy association meetings.
Among them may be mentioned New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Ohio,
and Massachusetts. These contests have proved of great benefit to
dairymen, particularly in pointing out defects in the product and in
the styles of bottles used, and suggesting remedies for the same.
One of the most common defects in milk, and one which can readily be
seen, is the foreign matter in the bottom of the bottle, consisting
usually of particles of manure, hair, bedding, etc. The presence
of dirt indicates careless and uncleanly methods in production and
handling. Another common defect is off-flavored milk, which may
be due to a variety of causes, as (1) to feeding strong-flavored
foods, such as turnips, garlic, etc.; (2) to feeding certain foods
to excess, as, for example, silage; (3) to odors of silage or manure
in the stable; (4) to particles of manure and dirt getting into the
milk, and (5) to not properly rinsing the bottles after using washing
powders. Dairymen as a rule have been quick to see these defects
when pointed out and to appreciate the importance from a business
standpoint of producing milk as nearly perfect as possible.
THE FIRST CITY DAIRY CONTEST.
In view of the success of the national contest and those of several
States, it was thought that the plan might be applicable to cities.
Steps were therefore taken to give it a trial. As the city of
Cleveland had already adopted the Dairy Division score card for
rating dairy farms, and as this city was making a special effort
to improve conditions in the dairies and the quality of its milk
supply, arrangements were made with the Chamber of Commerce to
conduct the contest under its auspices. This organization looked
after the printing of the entry blanks, score cards, and letters to
dairymen and mailing the same; furnished the hall for the meetings
and laboratories for the chemical and bacteriological work; offered
medals for the best milk and cream and the best dairy farms, and also
furnished one judge. The Dairy Division performed the chemical and
bacteriological work and supplied two judges. Some 400 producers of
milk for the Cleveland market were present at an all-day conference,
when addresses on timely subjects were given by representatives
from the Department of Agriculture and the Cleveland Chamber of
Commerce, extracts from which are given elsewhere in this article.
Many questions were asked by the dairymen present, which resulted in
valuable discussions.
There were three classes in the contest, as follows:
_Class I. Market milk (raw)._--This comprised all milk not
“certified” or sold under any guaranty as to its quality. A very
large percentage of the milk supplied to our cities is of this
character. It was specified that it must not be pasteurized or
contain preservatives.
_Class II. Market cream (raw)._--It was specified that this product
should be sweet, unpasteurized, and free from preservatives.
_Class III. Dairy farms._--All dairymen having exhibits of milk or
cream in the above classes were permitted to enter the dairy-farm
contest. These farms were visited by the judges and scored on the
basis of a score card (see page 14).
CONDITIONS OF ENTRY.
Entry blanks were prepared for both milk and cream, but as they were
quite similar only the one for milk is presented here:
[Dairy meeting and milk and cream contest, Cleveland, Ohio, March
16, 1907, under the direction of the Dairy Division, Bureau of
Animal Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture.]
OFFICIAL ENTRY BLANK.
CLASS 1. MARKET MILK (RAW).
P. O. address: ----, ----. Date: ----, 1907.
C. B. LANE,
_Assistant Chief, Dairy Division_:
Please enter for me 6 quarts of milk to compete for prizes
offered by the Cleveland Chamber of Commerce, March 16, 1907, in
accordance with the conditions herein prescribed.
(Signed) ---- ----.
Rules: (1) Exhibitors are allowed to make only one entry in each
class. This must include in Class I 6 quarts of milk in bottles
(quarts or pints), placed in a box suitable for shipping. (2)
The milk to be the property of the United States Department of
Agriculture. (3) Every exhibitor is required to fill out and sign
the following certificate:
I, ---- ----, hereby certify that the milk entered in this
competition is a fair sample of the product sold by me, that it
is free from preservatives, and that it has not been pasteurized
or sterilized.
(Signed) ---- ----.
(Proprietor) ---- ----.
HOW TO COMPETE.
Milk to compete for prizes must be sent by express or otherwise
from station nearest the producer direct to C. B. Lane, assistant
chief, Dairy Division, care Cleveland Chamber of Commerce,
Cleveland, Ohio. Express charges on exhibits must be paid to
destination.
The package should be plainly addressed on outside; a card should
also be tacked on box inside, giving plainly sender’s name and
address, so as to avoid mistakes in identifying packages.
In order that the milk entered by the exhibitors may be of the
same age when scored, it is hereby specified that it shall be
drawn from the cow March 11, and shipped by express or otherwise
as soon thereafter as possible.
A representative of the Department will be on hand to take charge
of the milk on its arrival and will see that it is properly cared
for.
Only these official entry blanks, furnished by the Dairy
Division, will be accepted.
QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED BY EXHIBITORS.
1. Give date and hour when this milk was drawn from the cow: ----.
2. Give place, date, and hour at which this milk was delivered to
the express company or otherwise shipped: ----.
3. Does this milk fairly represent the average product of your
herd in quality and cleanliness? ----.
4. How was the milk treated from the time it was drawn from the
cow until shipped? ----.
5. Do you wish to compete for the dairy-farm prize? ----.
Remarks: ----.
JUDGES.
It was arranged to give the products exhibited, as well as the dairy
farms in the contest, the most careful examination possible, so that
the final results would be beyond question; and it may be said that
the dairymen generally expressed themselves as well pleased with the
absolute fairness with which the contest was conducted. The judges
were C. B. Lane, assistant chief of the Dairy Division; Ivan C. Weld,
assistant dairyman, Dairy Division, and Dr. C. W. Eddy, chief of the
inspection division, public health department, Cleveland.
MEDALS.
As previously stated, the Cleveland Chamber of Commerce offered
medals to the dairymen. This feature increased the interest and
stimulated keen competition. A gold and a silver medal were awarded
for the two samples of milk scoring highest, and the same for cream.
Medals were also awarded to the five dairy farms scoring the highest.
LETTER TO DAIRYMEN.
In order to bring the matter before the dairymen the following letter
was sent to about 2,000 milk producers in Cleveland and vicinity:
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY,
_Washington, D. C., March 5, 1907_.
DEAR SIR: The Dairy Division of the United States Department of
Agriculture is arranging for a dairy meeting and milk and cream
contest to be held in the Chamber of Commerce hall, Cleveland,
Ohio, March 16, 1907, in cooperation with the municipal
sanitation committee of the Chamber of Commerce. The object of
the meeting is to discuss with the dairymen problems relating to
the production and handling of market milk and cream. A special
feature of this meeting will be an exhibit of milk and cream
from the dairymen supplying Cleveland. These products will be
carefully analyzed by experts from the Department and scored for
flavor, composition, acidity, general appearance, etc. There will
be three classes in this contest, as follows:
Class I. Market milk (raw), two prizes (gold and silver medals).
Class II. Market cream (raw), two prizes (gold and silver medals).
Class III. Dairy farms, five prizes (gold and silver medals).
After being scored, all the milk and cream will be placed on
exhibition, accompanied by the score. Questions regarding the
scoring of the various products will be cheerfully answered.
Prizes will be awarded to those scoring highest in each
class. The whole object of the meeting and of the exhibits is
educational and entirely for the benefit of the dairymen.
All dairymen supplying milk or cream to the city of Cleveland
are invited to exhibit in one or all of the above classes, in
accordance with the conditions on the entry blanks inclosed
herewith.
In addition to prizes offered for the milk and cream exhibited,
prizes will also be given in Class III to the five dairy farms
scoring the highest. Only those dairymen, however, having
exhibits of milk or cream will be entitled to have their dairy
farms scored and to compete for these prizes. If you desire to
compete for the dairy-farm prize, do not fail to answer question
5 relating to this on the entry blank provided for milk and cream.
If the milk and cream you handle are of high quality it should
be of interest and value to you to enter the contest. If your
product is not of good quality you ought to know it. The defects,
whatever they are, will be pointed out to you by those qualified
to make a careful examination.
Come prepared to ask questions and to get all you can out of this
meeting.
Respectfully, yours,
ED. H. WEBSTER.
_Chief of Dairy Division._
SCORING THE MILK AND CREAM.
The scoring was done on the basis of score cards, similar to those
used at the National Dairy Show already referred to. The standard
for perfect milk in the present contest, however, called for a much
smaller number of bacteria, and the standard for fat was also made
higher. The judges experienced but little difficulty in scoring the
various samples; in fact it was demonstrated that milk and cream can
be graded as accurately as butter or cheese by the use of the score
card, although the system is comparatively new.
All the milk and cream entered in the contest was produced March 11
and shipped to a cold-storage house in Cleveland. The scoring was
done March 14, when the product was three days old.
The score cards used in this contest are presented herewith:
SCORE CARD FOR MARKET MILK.
Exhibitor: ---- ----.
Address: ----, ----.
NUMERICAL SCORE.
-------+-------------+----------+---------+---------------+--------
| | | | Appearance of | Perfect
Flavor,| Composition,| Bacteria,| Acidity,| package and | score,
40. | 25. | 20. | 5. | contents, 10. | 100.
-------+-------------+----------+---------+---------------+--------
| | | | | Judge’s
| | | | | score.
-------+-------------+----------+---------+---------------+--------
DESCRIPTIVE SCORE.
----------+----------------+------------+----------+---------------
Flavor. | Composition. | Bacteria. | Acidity. | Package and
| | | | contents.
----------+----------------+------------+----------+---------------
Excellent.|Perfect. |Perfect. |Perfect. |Perfect.
Good. | | | |
Fair. |Fat, ---- |Total, ----.|---- |Foreign matter.
Bad. | per cent. | | per cent.|
Flat. |Solids not fat, |Liquefiers, | |Metal parts.
Bitter. | ---- per cent. | ----. | |
Weedy. | | | |Unattractive.
Garlic. | | | |
Silage. | | | |
Manure. | | | |
Smothered.| | | |
Other | | | |
taints. | | | |
.... | | | |
.... | | | |
----------+----------------+------------+----------+---------------
Remarks: ----.
Date: ----. ---- ----, _Judge_.
DIRECTIONS FOR SCORING.
FLAVOR.
If rich, sweet, clean, and pleasant flavor and odor, score
perfect (40). Deduct for objectionable flavors and odors
according to conditions found.
COMPOSITION.
If 4 per cent fat or above and 8.5 per cent solids not fat or
above, score perfect (25). Deduct 1 point for each one-fourth per
cent fat below 4 and 1 point for each one-fourth per cent solids
not fat below 8.5.
BACTERIA.
Less than 10,000 per cubic centimeter (perfect) 20
Over 10,000 and less than 25,000 per cubic centimeter 19
Over 25,000 and less than 50,000 per cubic centimeter 18
Over 50,000 and less than 75,000 per cubic centimeter 17
Over 75,000 and less than 100,000 per cubic centimeter 16
This page is an AI-organised index. The label means the grouping and cross-links were compiled with AI; the information itself comes from the public-domain books, reports and manuals listed below. Open any source to read the local copy or follow the link to the original publication.
Full text in the local archive
Bibliographic record from the archive catalogue.